The Problem With End-of-Contract Vehicle Returns
End-of-contract vehicle returns generate costly disputes. Consequently, customers face damage charges they did not expect. Furthermore, collection agents discover damage that they could have repaired cheaply weeks earlier. Moreover, paper-based inspection forms lack consistency and are easy to challenge.
Ultimately, the result is wasted time, increased complaints, and avoidable repair costs that erode your margins. Without a transparent, evidence-based process, every return becomes a potential conflict between your business and the customer.

Pre-Return Self-Inspection
Send customers a link 10 to 12 weeks before their contract ends. They photograph their vehicle against a guided checklist using their own smartphone — no app download required. You receive a complete condition report before collection day arrives.
Most importantly, this early visibility gives customers time to arrange their own repairs at a fraction of the cost of end-of-contract damage charges. Additionally, it gives your team the information needed to plan collection logistics and set expectations.
Fair Wear and Tear in Every Lease Return Vehicle Inspection
Consistent, defensible assessments aligned to BVRLA fair wear and tear standards.
Damage Documentation That Leaves No Room for Doubt
Comprehensive damage recording that protects your business and builds customer trust.
Reduce Dispute Costs
A transparent inspection process reduces complaints from the start. Specifically, when customers can see their vehicle’s condition documented clearly, with photos and annotations they can review themselves, they understand why charges apply. Give customers time to repair damage before return so they pay a local bodyshop instead of inflated end-of-contract rates.
Furthermore, you can document pre-agreed condition at the start of the contract and compare it against the return inspection. Therefore, evidence-based charges that customers can understand mean fewer disputes escalated to your complaints team and fewer cases referred to the Financial Ombudsman. In short, a structured lease return vehicle inspection process transforms every return from a potential conflict into a transparent, documented handover.

Collection Day Efficiency
Your collection agent uses the same platform to complete the return-day inspection. They follow the same guided process, capturing the same data points, on any smartphone. Importantly, the pre-return self-inspection is already on record, so the agent can compare the customer’s earlier submission against the vehicle’s current condition in real time.
The system flags any new damage identified since the self-inspection immediately. Additionally, digital signatures at handover confirm both parties agree on the documented condition. No paperwork to lose, no handwriting to decipher, and no room for ambiguity. The entire lease return vehicle inspection process — from pre-return notification to collection-day sign-off — runs through one platform, giving your team a complete, auditable record of every return.
Fleet-Scale Management
Manage hundreds of lease and PCP returns from one centralised dashboard.
Built for Leasing and Finance Professionals
A team with over 50 years of experience in the automotive remarketing industry built TradeAppraise. We understand the challenges of managing end-of-contract returns because we have faced them ourselves. Whether you manage a small PCP portfolio or thousands of lease returns every month, the platform scales with your operation.
Additionally, if you also manage an ongoing fleet vehicle inspection programme, TradeAppraise handles that too — scheduled driver self-inspections, damage tracking over time, and centralised reporting across your entire fleet. And when vehicles reach the remarketing stage, our vehicle condition report software ensures consistent, photo-evidenced documentation that maximises returns.